Whoever wins on our side faces Marco Rubio
Yesterday Mick Huckibee
suspended (meaning “ended”) his campaign for President. Today Rand Paul quit the Presidential race,
and tonight Rick Santorum has announced that he’s going to withdraw from the
race. It’s the liberal talk show hosts
that are much more- - perniciously against Senator Bernie Sanders rather than
people like Shawn Hannity. As I’ve said elsewhere Hannidy’s view of the
Iowa caucuses are in general more objective than the views we get from people
like Norman Goldman. These liberal hosts
will hang up on any caller who offers a negative view of Hillary Clinton. They offer little explanation for this permanent
barring of such callers other than it’s just “wrong” for a democrat to attack
another democrat. But by their
collective actions even people like Thom Hartman are systematically informing
their listeners not to vote for Bernie Sanders under any circumstances. It doesn’t matter whether Bernie has better
ideas. And it doesn’t even matter that
polls show that Bernie would do better against the top three republican opponents
than Hillary. Any discussion of Hillary’s
liabilities or weaknesses is simply “not allower”. Contrast this with the Republicans. They attacked Ted Cruz right and left
attacking the New York bank loans and his position on immigration in the past
and also the whole ethanol contraversy in Iowa.
Trump brought Sarah Palin into the campaign and even got the endorsement
of Iowa’s governor. It didn’t do any
good. My point is that hard work and a
good “ground game’ win the day. Bernie
Sanders could have had a victor if the would be supporters would have had “permission”
to vote for him by their esteemed leaders such as Thom Hartman and Norman
Goldman. Now Norman Goldman is as much
as calling for Bernie Sanders to drop out of the race after losing one
state. What are Goldman and Hartman
afraid of anyhow? I remember how Hartman
used to be having Sanders on his show every week. I long for the days when Hartman referred to
Bernie Sanders as “America’s senator”.
President Obama visited
a mosque today and it’s apparently the first time Obama has visited a mosque
since he’s been President. Shawn Hannity
threw a caniption fit over it and has two women with two competing opinions. One was in favor of the visit and the other
was and is rabidly against it. Hannidy
is talking about harshness toward religious minorities. And of course he’s talking about terrorism
and this mosque’s ties to Islamic terrorism.
Any time this President says anything favorable about Islam it sets off
alarm bells on the part of the far right.
According to this lady early in his carrier- - Mohamed spoke peace to
the Jews but when the Jews would not accept Islam then later verses were
written and under Islamic law the later verses of the Koran always supplant the
earlier verses. If this is so it’s not
the way Christians view the Bible. If
you asked me Obama made his first mistake severing ties with Jeremiah
Wright. Obama has been on the defensive
with regard to religion ever since he did that.
Sean Hannity did a
better analysis of the Iowa caucuses than did Norman Goldman. Donald Trump was the big loser of the day
coming in at 24% to Ted Cruz’s 28% and Marco Rubio at a strong third at
23%. Norman thinks that Bernie is a
lower because of the liberal grange movement that’s white and just the sort of
voters that go for Bernie. Sean Hannity
pointed out that there were six coin flips and Hillary won them all and won six
deligates. The basic percentage was
49.8% for Hillary to 49.6% for Bernie, or a two tenths of a percent margin of
victory. Don’t call her Landslide Hillary. But there was other funny business because
Hillary voters were counted even after they had switched their allegence to
Bernie at the caucus meetings. But
Bernie will get his comfortable victory in New Hampshire next week. It was 62 degrees today. I got vanilla flavored instant coffee from
Glen in his room for four cigarettes.
Norman Goldman is battling another pro Bernie caller defending his own hostility toward the Senator from Vermont. If we were believe Norman's breakdown of the demographics, you'd think nobody voted for Bernie since Hillary leads in all the categories except the youths. And the tilt toward Sanders there is impressive like 84% for Bernie ant 14% for Hillary. But Goldman says "This year there was nowhere near the number of youths that came out for Obama eight years ago. Actually the figure was down four percent. Goldman considers four percent "nowhere near". All it shows is that Sanders didn't lie and make wild promises the way that Obama did of things he never delivered on. Yet Hillary is running for a third year of Obama mention Obama's name any time she has a chance. I don't remember. Did Humphrey bill himself as "another term of the Johnson administration?" I don't think so. Hillary leads among minorities in a major way and by moderates in a major way. And yet there are key issues where Hillary fails. She fought for the Trans Pacific Partnership relentlessly over the past four years. Today they took some official ratification vote in New Zealand. Hillary took money from Goldman Sachs. Hillary is against bringing back Glass Steigle. Hillary is too extreme on the guns issue. There is a gender gap where women prefer Hillary. So in a sense she is the "women's candidate" being for things like abortion, and paid medical leave for new mothers. But the Trans Pacific Partnership is such an important thing I'd vote for Donald Trump over Hillary at this point because defeating the Trans Pacific Partnership is that important.
No comments:
Post a Comment