LEAVING EGYPT FOR GOOD

Yesterday the Senate followed the House in voting on an appropiations bill that fource a pull out of troops in Iraq by August of 2008. So both houses agree on this. Apparently two senators switched votes from a previous straw poll and one of them was Chuck Hagel. It seems to me an odd thing this is even an issue because doesn't the Constitution deligate the house as sole funding proprietor for appropiations for things like going to War. It would seem the intent of the writers of the constitution was that if a majority of congress does not agree to support a War, then the President can't levy that war. What do people like Larry Elder think of that? It's not a question of whether there is a two-thirds majority to override a presidento veto of a STOP to a war. That doesn't even make sense. It would be nice if Bush woke up and smelled the coffee but that's not going to happen. According to Thom Hartman many of the constitutional framers did not even favor having a standing Army in peace time. That would be interesting. But what they did want was for every citizen to be armed with his own firearm and to be a member of a state melitia. And there are those who even suggested mandentory service in one form or another to the State, kind of like Mao conscripting people to go out and sweep the streets. The notion of culpulsary service seems a little Maoist to me but according to Thom Hartman the core of liberalisum is being born into a "social contract" with society where we owe society something just for being born in this country. I'll think about it.

The news now is that that guy's mother who was killed in Afghanistan in 2004 who gave up a football carrerr now says that her son may have been deliberately shot by other soldiers to shut him up. He was vocal about the fact he was against the War in Iraq even though he was himself fighting in Afghanistan. According to his mother she was told first by the army "The terms of engagement were changed at the last minute and we are not allowed to tell you what they are". Also his personal diary was burned and his uniform was burned. Could it be that he did not just die of "friendly fire" but it was an ordered "hit" from higher up? If so this is another scandal that will never be investigated. According to a Russian newspaper the US plans to invade Iran on April 7th. or so just in time for a Moslem sabbath. (which would be a Friday not a Saturday) Of course we have moved air craft carriers into the region. Now it seems those Brittish sailors who were captured were not even in Iranian waters and Brittain is now saying "Iran stands alone in the world". But I suppose some would say as long as we have ships in the area anyhow we might as well drop a few bombs. Others say that the Russian newspaper story was planted by a conservative mole from this country for which reason God only knows.

John Mc Cain's cozyness tword the Bush adminestration is all the stranger because in his 2000 campaign for President he himself was the victin of the Bush Bragades. Karl Rove did "push polls" by which the Republican organization would call up voters and ask, "If you were to learn John Mc Cain had fathered a child of another race would you vote for him?" or "If you were to learn that John Mc Cain was certifyably mentally ill would you vote for him?" It would be against human nature to just dismiss such hostile action from another candidate. Could it be that Mc Cain is being blackmailed into not attacking the Bush Adminestration? It seems to me that some magic hand is pulling strings to cause Mc Cain to fall so dramatically in the polls now.

Gonsolez has apparently admitted that he got those eight prosecutors fired. He'll blow hot one minute and cold the next, admitting culpability one minute and denying it the next. It seems that in general the Bush Administration tries out various lies to cover up their deeds. Some "play well" and others don't, and the lies that don't play well get "updated".

There have been two major marijuana plant busts in the past week involving houses within three miles of each other here in California. They had gro-lux tubes and heating lamps even and irrigation systems on a timer. Both hauls were huge taking a lot of grass off the market.

I guess the question is what do we do about George Bush? I think if I were starting a new political party I would put out an expanded version of our US Constitution going paragraph by paragraph and line by line explaining what I think each one means and how it applies to today. Clearly the house needs to draw up a bill of impeachment or update an old one including the latest outrages as they occur, and get a case they will prosecute fully and not back down on. Of course you only need a majority to bring charges. Getting a 2/3 vote to convict in the Senate should be no problem once you get a snowball affect going. I would take longer than the Republicans took with Clinton in the Senate. A lot longer. The republicans were just playing around after a certain point just going through the motions to get the whole thing over with, as though they'd regretted bringing charges at all. It won't be that way this time around. But if they don't act soon nobody will care because Guiliani will be President. That's what apathy does for you. You and I know certain people - and the polls say 45% of Americans, will never vote for Hillary for President. But not only is it a growing certainty that Hillary and Rudy will be the two candidates, with no third parties, but that Giuliani will take it all on January 20th. 2009.

You know sometimes you have to wonder what is going through God's mind. There is a soap opera character on Passions named Sheridan. And she framed a guy named Luis for rape and then murder hoping then to be his "Rescuer". Now Luis faces the death penalty and Sheridan is telling others, "Gee, if there were another murder now that would take the heat off Luis, wouldn't it?" Of course she is planning to murder again. She's planning to murder this bar tender with exculpitory evidence that would free Luis. It sounds to me like Sheridan's thought processes are muddled. People said in Moses' day that "What we need is a man to become a shave and then rise up and save our race" kind of like Jesus became man to save man. But this thinking too is addaled. Because throughout most of their time in Egypt the Hebrews were not even in slavery but dwelt in the best of the land. But now they were inslaved and they had two choices. Either Moses could say "In a few weeks I'll become Pharoah and as such my Will will be law and I can free the slaves". The alternative is to wait another fourty years, longer than the life span of a slave, for Moses to come back from the wilderness and send all those plagues and such. If I were a slave in that forty years I wouldn't be too happy with Moses' decision.

Of course the whole History of Isrial is quite likely very different from that portrayed in the Bible in some key aspects. In the book, "The Secret Passage of the Lion" it says that Solomon was king around 1450 BC and not 960 BC as most Bibles stipulate. What this means is that Jerusalem was not yet taken over by the Jebusites yet and that the name of the City was Salem which means "Peace". Scripture says that at the time of Solomon the Sodomite was in the land. We know from Genisis that Sodom was wiped out by God, and so this passage is a clear time deliniator. It also says that Egypt was a mighty empire and invaded Palestine at the time of Solomon's son, Rehoboam and took back all the gold of the temple. Later on a couple of Kings later it states that at the time of King Johasaphat the tample was in shambles in disuse. How did it get this way so quickly? My guess is that there is a time gap between King Asa and King Johasaphat of several hundred years. If you compare events between King Asa and his "son" Johasaphat, none of the players is the same on the national scene. All of the Kings are different. Scripture also gives a possible alternate explanation for the slavery of the "Isrialites". The first time (according to Garner Ted Armstrong) Judah and Isrial are mentioned together Judah was at war with Isrial. What it looks like happened was that King Rehoboam, son of Solomon decided to oppress "Isrial" a people to the north and virtually enslaved them. It was "Judah" from the south, that "got the idea to sell "Joseph" (Isrial) of the north into Slavery in Egypt, which was then a mighty empire. Since the Bible also says "Egypt would never again be a mighty empire" this is another time-line indicator. So "Isrial" went into Slavery for several hundred years. It's dubious the story of Joseph and his favor happened at all. I would also like to mention that there were Dardanians in the land who were "Elders" in the time of King Solomon. The word gets mixed up with "Dan". It says "Dan" abode in ships and finally sailed away from the Philistine shore to Greece to become the Trojans in 1100 BC. Sometimes the Dardanians (sons of Zerah) are called "Danus". The word Danus means "Judge". And it's known that "Elders" were also known as "Judges" and in denominations such as the Presbyterians, it's these "Judges" or "Elders" that accept or reject a perspective member joining the church. Justin Martyr in his "Dialog with the Greeks" states that one thing Palestine or the Hebrews have is Antiquity and that they are more ancient than the Greeks. If the Trojans are the Dardanians or "Danus" this isn't quite true. Justin states that this is part of the appeal of Judaisum. The other appeal of Christianity is that they talked to God directly via the Holy Spirit, as an "old man" told him one day while walking on the sea shore. Of course if you're like me, an "objectivist" you believe that God if he exists is provable. But if there are "Elders" or "Judges" to which earthlings are accountable, it's the Dardanians or ancient Trojans, rather than your local pastor. I welcome any "discover of God" that's demonstrable in objective fact.

Montell Williams had a psychic on this afternoon. She got messages from dead people. What I believe she picks up on is some remaining ektoplasum or "aural energy" left over from the dead person that somehow congiels and just "hangs in the air" at a certain locations. Many if not most of the questions asked this lady psychic involve "What was the dead person thinking at the time of their death?" The only violation of this rule is that one womans mother has "re entered the world", reincarnated as a baby in Idaho. The other case was a man's mother who carried a lot of resentment and bitterness. But the psychic said "When she passed to the Other Side" all of those feelings went away". I'll tell you what vibes I'm getting from John Lennon. That he feels trapped where he is. He spends all day jamming with different musicions and keeps thoughts of Yoco Ono from his mind. This is partially because the Federation is hostile to Yoco's native planet, which is in the Pliades. This is John Lennon's fate. To psyche and brainwash himself into thinking he's happy when if he thinks about it he isn't. You know John Lennon once said "Better free your mind instead" (Revolution) I never like that line. I guess one reason why I don't like it is because it could easily become corrupted to "Better free yourself in your own mind", which degenerates into "your own imagination". A person should CLEAR his mind. That's a given. But to SEE that you aren't FREE is not a sin. Some people have objective provable chains of bondage of one kind or another, most likely economic. In Jesus' day I suppose Jesus' biggest fans were people who believed "Better free your mind instead". The word "Instead" conotes to me that the Real World isn't all that important. But like I say I am an objectivist. Sometimes printing presses need to be forged into opperative guns. (Selah)

THE AUTHOR AND FINISHER
OF OUR SOAP OPERA

I get a little exasperated with the news because it all seems to point to the same thing. The Democratic congress is never going to get any successful investigations and Bush is going to leave office just as powerful and with an iron lock on all "Truth" as he currently is. He'll just hand off power to his dictator in waiting, Rudolph Giuliani, and we'll continue out till 2019 the same way we have been going. Look at the Alberto Gonsolez investigation. If this were thirty years ago Alberto would be GONE by now. Look at how fast John Mitchel was fired as Watergate was starting to raise its head. There were no massive media fights to keep John Mitchel on. Say what you want to about Nixon he has more of a sense of "ought" than George Bush has. Now there is this woman White House leazon who is taking the fifth amendment when she testifies. The stupidest thing you could do now is to give her Immunity from prosecution. They did that with Oliver North but I've got news for you; you don't grant immunity to a pathological liar so he can continue to propigate his lies. And if you're out to impeach a president you don't think about pardons because the Constitution plainly says that after a president is Impeached he is nonetheless liable for any and all prosecution. It would be argued that what Gerald Ford did in pardoning Nixon was unconstitutional. Clearly as you look at Bush's activities we are already well into impeachment territory. As Thom Hartman stated yesterday- - the question of firing honorable government office holders without good cause was discussed in the very first congress in 1789 and Madison said that the unauthorized removal of any duly constituted prosecutors would be grounds for impeachment. Some would argue that the "government can't be frozen" or "wrapped up" or "have its time occupied" by impeachment. Well guess what? This congress isn't going to pass any other bill that the President is going to sign because the democratic lead isn't that great in the House to begin with and the lead is paper thin in the Senate. For all practical purposes, government is paralyzed. The Clinton adminestration happily worked with Republicans in the nineties. But this Bush adminestration shows no such bi-partisan inclinations. We are still letting the Republicans define all the terms of the argument. The media no longer sees the democratic cause as a noble cause to crusade for as the media did fourty years ago with the War in Vietnam. Today no reporter will leak any hard news or good story because they are so buddy buddy with all of their White House sources. I remember back a year ago last winter (early 2006) all the impeachment charges were being laid out then and people were saying "Just wait untill we democrats get into power. Then you'll see things begin to happen". But we haven't seen anything happen. No matter how blatent the abuses of power are with this Presidency there is always Tony Snow or someone whom the media listens to to explain it all away.

In terms of these attacks on Katie Curic leveled by Mr KABC or whoever he is- - I would only say that it's good that she asked all the hard questions and the Edwards' responded to them boldly. Mr. KABC has been known to "turn" on people be they callers or even guests for no reason at all and yesterday's show on 1150 was clearly a "get Katie" show. The phrase "some people say - - " is less inflamitory than other expressions she might have used like "It's a given that- - " or "It's comon knowledge that- - - " or "Every body knows- - ". If it were me they were talking about these broader tar brush expressions would be used. I think Katie had a job to do and she did it well. It's true that Katie pursued her own carrerr earning million dollar income with her husband dying of colon cancer but guess what? She wouldn't be the first hypocrite, and she isn't the last one. Let's just say that Mr. and Mrs. Edwards won that verbal duel Sunday night on Sixty Minutes and everybody should be glad of that. I would have to say at this point that Edwards is best on the issues of any of the three leading democratic candidates. I think he sees the situation in America most clearly now of the three top candidates. I've found O Bama disturbingly lacking in substance the more I hear him and the more I read his material. Hillary's problem is she cares more about one ups manship and politics than she does doing what is morally right. Hillary isn't really a crusader for good causes but rather is a political "triangulater" like her husband was, playing one group off against another and hoping to come up a winner. On the war she's afraid to say what the rest of us are thinking and feeling but instead scared spitless she may say something to "offend" the Giuliani campaign in the fall of 2008. She's the ultimate "me, too" candidate.

This computer just crapped out on me. My internet connection was broke. I still had what was in the cache and so transferred the file and got it back but if I didn't know better I'd say there was something conspiritorial at work. We'll continue now.

Tony Snow's colon cancer has now spread to his liver. I guess the media is getting us all confortable with the idea that all our lives are finite and if we're under a medical death sentense of a few months it's no big thing any more. If this were a soap opera like Passions if we were given six months to live we would spend that entire time puking our brains out in the hospital from chemotherapy watching our hair fall out so we could have eight or nine months to live in that state instead of of the six months we'd other wise have getting on with life. I guess it used to be that being under a medical death sentense like Tony Snow and Elizabeth Edwards are meant your employment prospects would be severely compromized and nobody would want to hire you. Perhaps times are changing. One person raised the issue of whether Tony Snow would do a death bed "Mia copa" like Lee Atwater did just before he died in which he admitted that all those political dirty tricks he did were wrong. My oppinion was that Lee Atwater was astrologically compromized in that his death was just an event in the overall scheme of things and the rise of Bush's enemies and the decline of Bush's astrological fortunes.

Life is a soap opera. Like Days of our Lives or Passions, once you know the "Ways" of the author events become quite predictable. My philosophy is "knock off the person who's been writing all those bad political scenarios and get someone on our side in the position, and all of our problems will be solved. Some people say that if we could tap into the Psychic dimension we could control all that stuff. This seems to be the dimension where the chessboard of events is being determined. This dimension is like two opposing authors battling on who gets to write the scripts for world affairs depending on who controls what on the chessboard. As I look at the future I don't feel confident. Of course sometimes "feelings" are inaccurate, but most often "first impressions" turn out to be a lot more accurate than you think they are. In the I Ching you go by the first toss of the coins, not the ninth or tenth that you do "to get a better reading". It's even adversely referred to as "importunity". "Importunity" really doesn't work with prayers either. God would help us all out if he'd just give us a green arrow or a red one to let us know if he's with us or against us and let us plan our lives accordingly from there. Don't work yourself up through positive confession into some "State" where you think "everything is going to work out fine" only to find that in the end nothing at all has changed.

The news now is that the US is going to invade Iran on April 15th. 16th. and 17th. Of course we won the War in Iran in the first three weeks but we just don't know it. We took out their government and wiped out their military and devistated their country bombing all of those expensive pallaces that may have had historical value for art collectors or something. But the truth is that Iraq's military was weak before we invaded and Saddam was compliant letting UN investigators search for weapons of Mass Destruction anywhere they wanted to. And they didn't find any. Of course the media led by the conservatives was apparently lying to us the whole time about all of this. Now Iran can look at what they did to neighbor Iraq when they were compliant. And then can turn and look at North Korea, who are bulligerant and Kim Jung Ill is bulligerant saying he's boing to bomb the West back to the stone age, and we make DEALS with him. Obviously Iran is watching this and thinking "We can win if we just up the bidding price a little. A little more bulligerancy on our part and we'll get a better deal". As I said in the last blog I don't think an invasion of Iran will happen at all. We'll have to see who is right. A caller on the Thom Hartman show today, or the Astrological indicators. To me it just doesn't make sense for Bush to invade Iran. It's a larger country, with twice the population and bigger than that in land area. And Iran's military is intact. They have men and planes and ships that have not been devistated by war. There was a woman caller today who said something some of you pro Draft people (and I'm not talking about beer) should think about. And that is the one thing limiting Bush now is not congress or popular oppinion. The one thing limiting President Bush's widening the war in the Mideast and ramping up the casualties is that we have no draft. Just think of all the young people Bush could lead to their deaths if we had a draft? Should we give an obsessed man everything he wants? I say before we institute a Draft we had first better get ourselves another President. One who thinks before he leaps.

In terms of the whole en-grams thing we talked about, I should have said "compatable" engrams rather than "homogenious" engrams when I was talking about souls criss crossing into other peoples' bodies. They have to have "compatable" engrams in terms of agreement to do something. There are also "hostile takeovers". In fact the whole thing with the Centaurians is that they are people from another Realm out to take over the bodies of earthlings. But even in this case you need compatable en-grams. Just like a computer virus has to "speak the same language" before it can take over your computer or a virus in your body has to replicate your DNA in order to get access to any organisum. But right now I believe I've said enough on this topic only to say that with engrams - - distance really doesn't matter. You don't have to do a valcan mind meld routine to enter another body. Engrams work with different physics.

Back when Reagan was running for governor of California he said that Pat Brown had “looted” the state. This was a lie. But the Bush administration according to the Thom Hartman show today has looted a lot of people. First all the government has looted the social security fund. It was agreed 25 years ago under Reagan that this would be the first generation to not only pay for their parents’ retirement but their own as well so rates were jacked up to thirteen percent. But of course that fund has been routinely looted by Bush and the Republicans despite strident promises on both sides of the aisle in the campaign of 2000 that this money would be kept safe. This “lock box” line was a major issue in the campaign of 2000. Next our children are being robbed. The tax cuts of the rich are ballooning the federal deficit, which is something our grand children will have to pay back at God knows what interest rates. Of course GATT and NAFTA have enabled rich corporations to loot underdeveloped countries such as Mexico, which contrary to the promises people like Gore and Clinton made, is not better off today but worse off under NAFTA. The only difference is that Ford plants have been moved from Flint, Michigan down to Mexico, where the people work for peanuts. Back in the Eisenhaur administration is was a common belief that the highest paid CEO should not make more than twenty, or at most thirty times the pay of the lowest worker. This ethic went out the window under Reagan. Under GATT and NAFTA the percentage of wealth in America owned by foreigners has gone from 12% to 24%. And that’s just since 1995 when these two treaties had already been in place two years. China may decide to pull the plug on us because if they ever discover the former American virtue of “self reliance” they will stop buying our goods or anything else we trade with them. They will stop investing in this country. Bush has now secretly begun to inflate the US dollar and we’re apparently trying to duplicate the fate of post WW I Germany who thought it could pay back its creditors with inflated currency. If that happens there will come a point where China and Asia at large will refuse to accept our dollars as payment. Bush has stopped publishing the M 3 money indicator, which shows how much money is being printed without any backing. The savings rate in this country is now at a negative 2% because people are using their homes as an ATM machine borrowing on homes with little or no equity in them. The Federal Reserve wants to increase interest rates but there are fears that if they do so that the housing market will collapse and housing at this point is the only thing that’s keeping this economy afloat. I suppose at this point “It’s not a question of Whether but When”. People keep saying that the Feds manage our money growth so well that we have in our economy “outgrown” the idea of recurring recessions. The thing is about recessions is that they happen when you’re not expecting them, and you can’t always predict how bad they will be before they hit. It would be a pity for the Republicans if the next election hit right at the heighth of the 2008 election campaign season.

Stacy Taylor took a caller that questioned whether today’s conservatives are really conservatives, because they don’t take responsibility for the consequences of their own actions. Tony Snow in 1998 said that Clinton Aids should testify and that executive priveledge was a bogus concept that is often abused. I imagine Tony feels different about that today. This same caller said that John Edwards is already up for abuse by Rush Limbaugh calling this Edwards press conference this morning a political stunt to get votes and sympathy. Most of the time I hear Rush Limbaugh now it’s not directly but it’s from some report of something outrageous that he has stated. Listening to his show straight through must be really trippy these days. I guess Thom Hartman has it right when he said that liberals believe in the people, plural, first. But the Republicans believe in isolated individual person-s first. We thought the corporations were taking over the Media and the Nation thirty years ago when “Network” came out. Just think how much worse it is now. I guess the American Dream used to be having a confortable house to live in and raise your kids and have enough money to retire and get medical benefits. Now it seems the American Dream is to win the Lottery. And as we know there aren’t many lottery winners. Rush Limbaugh is one. Perhaps Larry Elder is another. But we know there aren’t that many filthy rich people out there. I suppose there are some who view liberals the same way that those Hippies were portrayed on yesterday’s King of the Hill episode, as lying, manipulative, thieving leeches. But we know where all the biggest corporate walfare goes. The drug companies are the only segments of society that don’t have to bid competitively for pricing. If capitalism is good for anything it’s to get the lowest price on something for your money. And when Government is spending the peoples’ money this should be doubly true, but sadly it too often isn’t.

PREVIEW OF SOME COMING NEWS

Well I don't have any ideas myself about the future. That's why I consulted the stars. I haven't made really good use of astrology in some time. Here's what's going to happen. The US is going to strike a peace deal with Iran that will also help to scale the Iraq war way back such that troops will be sent home in the next few months surprizing many and relieving everyone and also bolstering Republican's chances for President. But in the long run it will prove to be the wrong decision because Iran right now is in a state of extreme astrological weakness and if we kept the pressure on their government just might topple, but it won't happen that way. As a result of this and also astrologically based, the security right wing of the Republican party will be bolstered in their egoes and become more bold and demanding. I see either Giuliani or Romney benefitting the most. As for George Bush there will be a rash of announcements from the White House but playing the probabilities they'll be a week later than we said before. It should be sometime the Saturday before Easter and the headlines will fill the Sunday morning news. It looks as if not only Alberto Gonsolez will resign (which the right wing will bitterly resent and Rush Limbaugh will attack Bush for doing it) but also Dick Chaney will resign the Vice Presidency for health reasons, possibly that blood clot thing. Even after Dick Chaney resigns his health will be in jeopardy and he may just end up dying soon anyhow, suddenly.

I'd like to clarify a thing or two from the last Blog after talking to the Federation. That bit about two people with the same "soul" not knowing each other- - can't happen. To clarify your soul is defined as pure consciousness as limited by the engrams you came into the world with, plus the ones you develop afterward that aren't cleared. Some see the soul as some liquid substance that's shot into the cell at the time of conception with a hypodermic needle or something, and at death this same substance just vaporizes into the ether looking for a new home. Just so you pro abortionists don't get upset it doesn't have to be at conception. It could be after forty days or at the time of birth or even after birth, believe it or not. The reason why your soul could not be in two places at once is because even with a hetrogenious body (two different people) the souls or spirits can criss cross and swap places mutually volentarily, if there are similar engrams between the two people prompting it. Some of you may ask about identical twins. These two are homogenious in body but can be highly hetrogenious in the make up of their souls and they might be quite incompatable for a swap and incompatable in engrams. The question remains "Can a spirit have consciousness out of the body, and if so how?" The soul would seem tied to the body biologically. I have speculated in the past whether the population explosion might cause a "shortage of souls" so that one soul would have to be used for several incarnations. And do they have to be consecutive or can they be concurrent? The Bible teaches reincarnation, believe it or not. I'm not lying to you. In corinthians 15 it talks about a "seed" being planted. This is the soul of your former life "planted" in a new body and as the Apostle states, what grows up may not resemble what the soul was before, physically. Keep in mind this business of judgement upon death and going to heaven when you die is virtually unbiblical, and don't quote me Hebrews, a book with no Author. Pastor Bob Hawland, who pastored in my church nearly thirty years ago states, correctly that when you die your body turns to ashes. It decomposes. At a later date (12 Billion years from now when the Universe ends) God "remembers" you. The soul is said to "sleep" between lives because if there is another life you have no conception of the passage of time, not to mention no memory. Whether this "body" is a naturally or test tube "conceived" body or one that is "A New Creation" by God on "The Last Day" really doesn't matter. The soul is being reincarnated none the less. So don't say it doesn't happen. As to any "judgement" I know of no "dialog" between a subject and God after they die that isn't part of a metaphorical parable like Luke 16. We know the damned are judged and inialated, with no report of any "dialog with God" or "review of your life". As to the saved, we know the first thing that happens to them is they go to a Wedding Feast. "Dinner and a tournament". You have to ballance the whole reward - punishment idea against the "pass - fail" system also alluded to.

I had one of those "Ah ha!" light bulb moments this afternoon. Remember that Next Generation Startrek episode "The Price" where they are negotiating for a business contract and the one guy is partially psychic and "cheating" and he invented this incident with the Forengi of a hostile nature to scare this one party into doing business with him rather than a rival. But the incident was faked because they made Peace so quickly. Don't you think the Church and Rome made peace awfully quickly? Constantine went from persecutor to head of the church and giving orders virtually overnight even though some say he believed in "Sol Invictus" more than he did Jesus. Yet Constantine became almost titular head of the Church. How? Romans 13 says that all government is instituted by God and is to be cooporated with. The biggest secret that will be revealed is that Donetian was a closet Christian as the Catholic Encyclopedia hints at and one ancient historian brings up an incident of.

If someone were asking me what my belief about the Constitution was say if I were applying for Supreme Court Justice or something I'd say I was a strict constructionist with the constitution, just like Thom Hartman seems to be. But with one exception. Where is says "be secure in your persons, papers and effects" I'd take "papers" to mean anything on computer or I pod or disk. It's only logical to assume this. There is a mention in "reefer madness" that formerly they said that because of the interstate commerce restriction in the constitution, the federal govt. could not go after drug traffic. I would take a look at their logic and if it passed muster, then I'd end all Federal drug laws.

PSYCHIC WAR BATTLEFIELD

Today the Swallows return to Capistrano signaling the onset of spring. Today is also the fourth anniversary of the Iraq War in the Mideast. Protests have occurred all over the nation and in countries all around the world. Basicly it's Mr. Bush against the whole world. The whole world is watching. Perhaps they were watching Sixty Minutes last night. They had this squad or marines that wasted nineteen people in Iraq and they were all unarmed civilians. Five were gunned down when told to "halt" and they didn't so they were shot. The others were wasted in a house to house search where they would roll in a granade to a house and what the explosion didn't kill they would go in and kill. According to the guy on TV last night they were just acting according to instructions and procedures they were taught. They were taught to be killers. Like a lot of cops if they rightly or more likely, wrongly, perceive their lives in danger they will just start firing away untill they have killed everybody. In Dateline on Saturday night on KNBC they had this "mean old man" as I refer to him as who killed this younger but balding guy. He claims he just met him on a hiking trail and the guy threatened to kill him though the victim proved to be unarmed. Then the old man fired three times at him with hallow tipped "cop killer" bullets and killed him. He was found guilty by an Arizona jury but now they're going to change the law so that you don't have to "prove" you were acting in self defence. Now any old paranoid delusion will do. Neadless to say I think the new law is dangerous.

I just want to say at this point I’m pissed at Blogger first for calling my blogs Spam and secondly by not even including letters that I was supposed to be copying. I guess they expect me to be psychic, too. Maybe I’m just too intelligent for these people. Maybe I’ll stop blogging. It’s hard to say whether anybody really follows them.

We've learned a bit more on a forty year old incident in or near the Orion Federation. Remember I said that the planet Aldeberan IX was blown up by Alcyonne "Just to prove they could do it". Apparently though peaceful in population, the buzz was that Aldeberan IX was an important psychic link in the chain of command rebelling against Alcyonne, and this is why the planet was picked to be destroyed. If you're wondering what if any manifestation destruction of said planet had on planet Earth the answer is within a little over a year you saw a decline in the psychedellic movement both artisticly, musically, and chemicly and intellectually. I don't think it's possible to overstate the impact the assasenations of Dr. King and Robert Kennedy had on the left wing community. These two losses decimated it and caused it to lose direction. The idea of a President of the United States declaring war on the Left did not occur untill that "great silent majority" speech given by Spiro Agnew in November of 1969.

Some may ask what the Psychic Realm or some would say the Federation realm has to do with events on planet earth. Let's back up and talk about all six dimensions for a bit. There are the three spacial dimensions of length, heighth and width. Then there are two interractional dimensions of Time and "lateral time" or alternatives we think Didn't Happen, but their existance in an abstract sense is just as real. In the I Ching the triagrams of fire over heaven has the meaning of "Posession in great measure". You should read some lines from "Chapter 14" I believe. In this hexigram there is one dark line and that is in fifth place. Some may ask if you can't "switch time-lines" in mid stream. The experts say you can't. Some may say that if you did some sort of witch's incantation or superstititious act you could change the future at least for yourself even if it means "crossing to another intersecting time-line". The reason why according to the Federation is (a) everything is predestined including your decision to change your future and Any Act you do in an attempt to change your future as well as any change in the future that Actually Seems to Take Place. It's all been predistined. (b) The reason why you can't "swap time-lines and have an different future" is because your karmic past determines your future and whatever time line you are on goes in a straight line, like inertia.

Let's talk about the sixth dimension. Perhaps the most obvious manifestation of this dimension is the phenominum of space folding. Just picture a sheet like a map being rippled up so that two former distant places are now ajoining. When this "link" happens it's as if you're transported to another place or connected to another mind. You may wonder what my position is on the subject of ether waves is. They still have not disproved the existance of "ether" in the universe and as an electronic medium of travel it proved out scientifically to act in a mathmatically proscribed way. As a medium for brain waves the federation has long stated that this is not how psychic linkage works. Sometimes it seems as if we can be warned or informed of things by distant relatives. But scientists have pretty much proven that no brain waves, notibly the kinds in an electro encephlograph are involved. Many people enjoy invisining "spiritual warfare" or "psychic warfare" as some sort of giant football field, or perhaps a chess board. Much of the goal is "controling the board" or paths of squares on the board and sometimes individual squares. When "your square" comes under favorible influence and favorible information comes through the psychic portal, you become aware of it and the course of your life will turn for the better now that your psychic obsticles have been eliminated. Christians are fond of the notion that some little thing I do here can influence the "spiritual warfare in heaven" to my favor. I am not going to dispute that. I don't even know if you're aware of the passage of time in the psychic dimension or what conscienciousness there is like. Christians like to assume it's sort of a "shaddow universe" that's just like here only everything is bright and shiny. I can neither confirm nor dispute this. The psychic real is the sixth or top dimension. Basically you have three physical space dimensions, two interractional dimensions, time and "the twilight zone" and you have the psychic dimension, called the telestial dimension. Logically if you folded space you would arrive at your destination with everything backwards. Were this to happen with time that would explain backwards talking in Satanism. As I have said before the only time you get a time shift with space folding is when there is "gravimetric interfearance". I would take this to mean a very strong gravity field, though it may refer to something more specific.

You know people ask “after you die what comes next?” Well there may not BE a “next” as one normally thinks of it. But the funny thing people talk about reincarnation but if you think about it “time is meaningless”. What’s to prevent one soul occupying two different body as the same time? But neither half would know the other existed and if they met neither would recognize that it was the same soul as the other. It would only depend on which conscience you perceived that you were. But even forgetting that strange scenario for the moment, I don’t see why you would logically remember anything from a previous incarnation if there were no “linear” progression of the soul. There might not even be any en-grams. In all probability this is the only life that you will remember as being “you”. Anyone else is someone else, even though it’s your soul.

We have talked about the big bang. However there is another explanation as to why the universe at its "edges" appears to be rappidly receeding from us "at an increasing rate". Have you ever thought that our entire universe is just a black hole in a bigger universe? It would explain a lot of the methematical mystories puzzling science. We have previously said that black holes weren't really "black" when you were sucked into them but just highly warped space. So why not? Space can shrink and expand and bend according to Einstein. They say that galaxies on the edge of the universe are "less evolved" and this proves we are looking back in time. I am not entirely convinced of this, ie. that there was a "starting point". If they say there was I won't argue with them. But I think scientists need to consider alternate explanations for some of these puzzling methematical formulas. They say time slows down when an object travels fast but it could just be the doppler effect, which would cause the same phenominum. Objects getting heavier when sped up? Centrifical fource. But I'm not going to argue about it. I'm just saying if this were a black hole in a larger universe we'd still have to go faster than light to travel there. As we said in "Dangerous Event Horizon" people DO travel faster than the speed of light when sucked into a black hole. They don't "become too heavy to move" as I'm seen in one illustrative drawing. I think many mystories are really less "mysterious" than Einstein portrays them. Like I say I don't think they pursue alternative explanations for the mathmatical equations involved. That's just my oppinion, of course.

THE SCIENCE OF UNREALITY

Today We're going to review a few basic facts we've learned

"If you had the luck of the Irish
You would wish you was English instead"

-John Lennon

You know, I should write a thing on ‘The Science of Unreality”. Jeff Lyons was complaining about this tired movie plot where a woman has a preminission her husband will die and then the next day she dies and then she’s back to before he died with her husband still alive, almost as if she’s being toyed with by the Gods to try and come up with some way of cheating fate. At two they had Stargate. This show of course is about the “Auri” who have a religion where they achieve immortality and they gain power according to the young boy by indoctrinating others because belief by others in them drains others of energy. The young boy could be an analogy of Zachery for you Z A C fans. They said his brain was so saturated with knowledge of the Auri it would explode or something. Apparently he used to be immortal but was fourced (?) to come back as a mortal and his memory wasn’t wiped and now he’s trying to impart all he knows to others while he still remembers it. Then at three we have Smallville. In this episode Superman dies via a gunshot wound. Apparently he had voluntarily given up his powers, which he later admits was a mistake. There seems to be some fource compelling Clark Kent not to reveal that he has powers. He was given back his powers by his father and left the hospital room where he had been pronounced dead, to go and chase after a missile to disarm the warhead before it hit the target. Apparently someone’s else life had to be sacrificed so that he could continue to live but I didn’t watch that part. There is no question writers’ imaginations work overtime to come up with these scenarios. I happened to pick up a New Testiment and read in the book of Mark that Jesus “came to” Galilee to start his minestry. Since Nazereth is a part of Galilee that opens the question of where he was before. Sometime people let things slip when they least intend to. Of course there is that new book called “The Secret”. This book puts forth the old Michal Benner idea that the mind is something that “attracts things to either good or bad thoughts” as if your own imaginings have the power to altar present reality around you. This is a silly notion. It’s one that very young children have. That’s why children enjoy playing “Peek-a-boo” so much. They think if they don’t see something that it vanished. This is why children close their eyes when they’re really afraid. The sad part is why adults are being infused with these notions. There was that guy on channel 28 one day who said “When you change the way you look at things- - the things you look at – change”. No they don’t. Thinking doesn’t make it so. There is resolve and planning and concentration, but the mind has no mystical power to altar what IS. If it were so I would not have been so continually burned by such Christians as “The asshole from El Paso”. Bad things happen to you because you DON’T expect them and not because you DO, because if you do expect them, you can plan for them in advanced. I used to be continually surprised by the way Christianity let me down. Larry Norman even had a saying “- - Like a moth drawn to the flame - -here am I talking about Jesus just the same”. But books sell of course and I don’t begrudge anybody their exercise in stupidity. Of course we at the Federation have talked about Fifth dimensional reality or Twilight Zone Reality. Some people may think of “your possible future paths” but according to the Federation this isn’t so because there is no NOW. NOW is an illusion. Let me give you one example. Chuck Smith used to talk about Christianity or “Belief” as going through a door. Once you’ve gone through the door you look back at the door and the sign says “You didn’t choose me; I chose you”. But Chuck isn’t even consistent with him self. Picture a planet or society perhaps like the Moslems where the highest state in the religion can be had by being murdered. Not killing others but by being murdered. But certain people are more likely to be murdered thus “Saved” or “Ascended” to use the Auri term- - than others. Why, those who are murdered for the gold in their teeth naturally. So it’s nothing you did or believed but merely someone knew you had gold in your teeth. Jesus once said the Kingdom of Heaven was like buying a field upon news that there was a treasure in the field. Whether it was honist not to tell the owner what his land was really worth- - we’ll save that issue for another day. Chuck says the treasure is the Believers. Well, the treasure was there before Jesus bought the land. After buying the land Jesus owned ALL of the land including the worthless rocks next to the treasure. You see (we have said this before) the non believers aren’t “sold to the devil when they die”. When you die whether you believe or not you are owned by Jesus. It’s just that Jesus doesn’t want you if your name isn’t among the Elect on a list somewhere. Think of it this way. For the elect, Jesus is “The God who refuses to accept No for an answer”. For the non elect Jesus is “The God who refuses to accept Yes for an answer”. Because if there’s one thing I’ve learned from the Devil is that anytime I question his supremacy over God, he’s ready and willing to “teach me another lesson”. One day I asked that Pastor in March of 1992, you know the Asshole from El Paso an open ended question. He refused to answer any of my other questions and I got a ton of insults. So I decided I’d see how he responded when I asked “What IS Christian Faith”. His answer was out of Hebrews, “Faith is the substance of things hoped for. The conviction of things not seen”. I quiveled with him about the Greek meaning but in the end I think his answer was pretty clear. It’s this kind of genie in a bottle “Faith” that the book The Secret perports to offer. But anytime one exercises this so-called Christian Faith, or rather Attempts to, it opens some sort of portal in the psychic dimension that opens yourself up for Satan’s machinations lest his authority be disputed. I like Luther say of my belief system, “Here I stand, for I can do no other”. It’s pretty much just that simple. It could be in some altered fifth dimensional reality you are saved in that dimension, just not this one. It just now occurred to me. If it’s true when you die you “get all the knowledge in the universe” that knowledge will be pretty much Worthless is you get ALL the knowledge, including that in the non real fifth dimension. But the Federation people say they can prove the fifth dimension actually exists by various mathmetical formulas and therums. The Federation just says “THIS reality, like the term NOW has the ILLUSION of being reality. As we have said the Fifth Dimension has a different Future and a different Past but only one point in time does it intersect with the here and now. But that realm is not provable in this four-dimensional Universe construct. But some will say to you that your future is a mystic “decision” that you make at a key time in your life. You can have a feeling or preminission about the future but don’t put the cart before the horse. The premonition or belief didn’t PRODUCE the reality; rather the future Reality PRODUCED the preminission. So far nobody is telling us how to change fate and the most scientifically informed among us say that it is Impossible. (Selah) It’s like that old adage, “You can’t get there from here”. George Burnes said “The reason why there is Evil is because if there is a Top there has to be a bottom”. I disagree with this because the analogy there is of a playing card or something. The “substance” of that reality is, let’s face it, mostly cardboard paper. “Tops” and “Bottoms” are just says of LOOKING AT various psychic and karmic realities. Mankind has had in its belief system for melinia that EVIL WAS NOT NECESSARY. Indeed this is the corner stone of most if not all religion. So in this sense I suppose you can call me a Religious person. (Selah)

There beith a roomer that the in the next two weeks the Federation is taking a "snap shot" of the earth and that many possible Future Judgements will be based on the following two weeks. On the other hand, this message may have gotten garbled in the translation.

The following songs and album concept were actually "in the pipeline" already. I may think fast on my feet but not That fast. For the most part, these are songs that were bumped when we decided to take our show on the internet. So here we go with our Alternatives to whatever KNBC is offering this evening. OK we are changing the album. There is a date and day disagreement anyhow but the Federation won't adapt this version of the album till after Sunday April first. The astrisk * denotes an addition from yesterday. The double astrisk ** denotes the two songs that have not been used on a compilation in the past three years before.

LOVE OR CONFUSION (rel. March 18th. 2007)

One Mint Julip (Clovers)

Sweets for My Sweet (Drifters)

Little Darling (Diamonds)

Tean Beat (Sandy Nelson)

He's A Rebel (The Crystals with Darlene Love)

The Stripper (David Rose & his Orchestra)

Wipeout (Safaris)

Nadeine (Chuck Berry)

Dead Man's Curve (Jan & Dean)

Pretty Woman (Roy Orbeson)

Come a Little Bit Closser (Jay & the Americans)*

The Game of Love (Wayne Fontanna)

They're Coming to Take Me Away (Nepolian XIV)

Somebody To Love (Jefferson Airplane)

Brown Eyed Girl (Van Morrison & Them)

Love Or Confusion (Jimi Hendrix Experiance)**

When the Music's Over (The Doors)**

- - - - - - - - -

[The Sunday Night Masacre (April 1st. 2007) 15:21] dropped

This track opens with lynchings in the south in the fifties, and some of the early freedom rider stuff with Martin Luther king and protests in the early 1960's and LBJ signing the 1964 Civil Rights Bill, moves on to the bridge at Selma, Alabama, and the Pentagon protest of October 1967 and then the King and Kennedy assasenations and then the Chicago riots, Kent State shootings, and early Watergate news ending with the Saturday Night masacre of October 1973 but I want all this done in rappid colloge overlapping and coming in oposit channels and occasionally moving accross the screen kind of giving a "Revolution no. 9 feel to it" - - - before segwaying into today's news where Gonsolez and Chaney and Karl Rove are all fired ("asked to hand in their resignations", i. e.) by George Bush on a Sunday Evening in response to the protests of so many and to clear the air so that government can function, but at the same time the dark clouds don't disappear from the Horizon with news that the troop surge is now thirty thousand and protests there won't be listened to.

SAY HELLO TO PRESIDENT GIULIANI

There can be little doubt whom fate has destined to be the next president of the United States at this date of March 17th. 2007 and that is ex New York mayor Rudolph Guiliani. Giuliani has been mounting an increasing lead in all the Republican polls and in about all the cross party polls, Guiliani beats any democrat. The media has been carefully building up Giuliani ever since nine - - eleven, and the Wickipedia's article focuses primarily on his activities as may or and post mayor activities. Giuliani has spent the past six years doing nothing but running for President and has courted all the right money sources. People may ask, "Well what Giuliani's relations with minorities and all those stories of police abuse?" Are you kidding? It doesn't matter. The "John and Ken" element is alive and strong in America today. This is the segment of the population that still has unreasoned fears of minorities and believes they have to hide behind locked doors. They still view minorities in general as "the bad guys" and strongly endource race based profilint both for Blacks and Arabs. They don't care about his three marriages or his messy divorce. They certainly don't care what his kids think of him. "You know how kids are" is the opperative line there. Giuliani to his supporters is like Superman. He "gets the job done" and they don't care if it's by smashing a few heads. If the public were really upset with Republicans they'd be calling for the impeachment of Bush, and Rove, and Gonsolez, and Chaney now. But they aren't. They don't consider it important whether Bush's abuses are ever prosecuted and they don't care about Guilanis abuses are ever looked into. They are looking for a man of strength and Giuliani is it. Once again the media has methodically been building Giuliani up for six years like they have no other candidate. When it comes to facing Hillary Giuliani has no problem. People want an Executive for the job and not a member of the legeslative branch. A lot of people still regard congress as a bunch of whiners and regards constitutional questions as "petty concerns". Curtess Slewah or the Guardian Angels has said what the Republicans need is a strong anti terrorist leader who is not beholding to the right wing on social issues such as marital fadelity or gays, guns, or abortion. I think we all basically "know" Giuliani is going to be our next President the way they "knew" Bill Clinton would be our next President on Superbowl night in January 1992 when he went on Sixty Minutes and Hillary did her "stand by her man" routine. The fact that there was a taped phone conversation of Slick Willy and Jennifer Flowere talking openly about their affair and how best to lie about it when it becomes public- - - didn't bother the voters. They saw "secret tape = bad" and Bill and Hillary = "good guys who are gossipped against. The fact that all the "gossip" was true is immiterial to these people just as it will be in Giuliani's case. People have decided "sex doesn't matter". What they want to know is if you're good with a police baton giving those "wood shampoos" as Curtess talks about so fondly. It doesn't matter how many other candidates the Republicans field now because they all have to share a percentage of the vote minus the portion that a priori goes to Giuliani, which is about 40% off the top. The more Republican candidates that enter the better Giuliani will look. John Mc Cain was the most serious threat but now he nas been neuteralized because people have linked Mc Cain with the Iraq War. The fact is that Rudy-baby wont's do a thing different from Mc Cain is immaterial to these supporters. Every other candidate has liabilities the media will tear apart. The media won't attack Giuliani because they like him and approve of him and are actively supporting him. I have no doubts but that Giuliani will further violate our civil liberties but he will have been elected by then for four years, so it won't matter what we think untill at least 2012 and who knows what will happen by then.

People want Alberto Gonsolez to resign but it's doubtful that he will. People think Valerie Wilson is getting and has gotten a raw deal, and she did. But people don't care. People view Valerie is just some glamour queen bimbo out to feather her own nest and out for publicity. They don't care about the real truth or the constitutional implications. There are few real fighters among the democratic candidates. I've been reading O Bama's book and what I sense is that he's a lot more obcessed with himself rather than America's problems or what specific measures to take to address them. I always thought Joe Byden would make a good candidate but every time he opens his mouth the media tears him apart. As for John Edwards the thing wrong with him is that he's not only a Loser, but a Loser to a Loser. I think parodies of him will be all to easy to do. Come February 5th. when America votes and picks the candidate they want to be President next year- - Edwards will probably come in a distant third in the polling. As to Hillary, she will win. But afterwards the Republicans will successful harness all of the pent up hatred and resentment tword her all these years. Remember Hillary almost uniquely among the candidates has a hard 45% of the people who will never vote for her regardless. A lot of us have long memories and remember her words about the "Vast right wing conspiricy". And when it comes to looking at Prosecutors the President or Rove or Harriet Mayers may have gotten fired- - all someone has to do is point to Bill Clinton's record with firing prosecutors and the issue is defused. From a standpoint of moral credability and the ability to run an agressive, assirtive campaign against Giuliani, Hillery is the worst candidate they could pick. But it won't matter. They will pick her anyhow. They'd rather pick Hillary and lose than pick anyone else who'll campaign on the real issues and have a good chance, therefore of winning.

There is apparently an anti war rally at the pentagon even as we speak. One wishes the protestors success. But deep down people can't stand protestors. It was the 1968 protests in Chicago that gave the 1968 presidential election to Richard Nixon. You will remember that about 57% of the people were for either Wallace or Nixon in that election. Had George Wallace not been running that election would have been a major landslide for Nixon. We have elected only one "liberal democrat" in the past fifty years and that was Jimmy Carter. I didn't vote for Carter either time but I still don't believe the bum rap he's gotten in the history books.

Finally I'd like to tell a little story. See if you recognize the source. One time Jesus Christ was going to stage the "Wedding feast of the lamb" with the Church as his bride in heaven. But the church over the period of waiting for the wedding became rather unfaithful and whorish, such that she became known as Babylon the Whore. Some people refer to Babylon as Rome, and perhaps first Peter supports this. Others say Babylon is New York. Perhaps. In the mean time there was another suitor for Babylon the Whore and that was Satan. Satan and Babylon the Whore were about to get married. But a girlfriend of Babylon the Whore named Maroni learned that Jesus Christ had a secret. Jesus had supernatural powers. Maroni wondered whether she should tell Babylon the Whore about this. What she didn't know was that Babylon the Whore was hiding in the corner of the room and knew Jesus's secret. But Satan's father, Jehovah laid down the law to Satan telling Satan if he wants to win his bride, Babylon the Whore, he has to play rough. So Jehovah intervened on his son's behalf and told Babylon about Zachary alias Radioactive Man. Radioactive Man loved to dine on Radon and breathed Radon gas to get energy. But Jesus was sensitive to radioactive stuff and too much of it would kill him. So Zachery knew how to kill Jesus. In a contest between Jesus and Radioactive man, the latter would be undisputed victor and the former, Jesus, would end up dead. So Babylon the Whore had no choice but to abandon plans to mary Jesus and instead marry Satan, who would then realize his plans to set up a world wide Empire of Darkness here on Planet Earth.

MARCUS ARELIUS YESTERDAY AND TODAY

There are certain signs that lead one to think progress is being made and there are other indications that progress is not being made. That General Keiley guy was finally fired from his post in connection with the Walter Reed scandal. This was one of the leading officials who has been for years instremental in the cover-up of the squalid conditions at Walter Reed. On the negative side there is those eight Special Prosecutors who George Bush has fired in the last few years because they were getting too close to the truth. Some believe there are conspiracies to keep the corporate status quo. Is Mark Hartman right. Is there some implicit conspiracy to make "Corporate Capitolisum" the official form of government in the world, both in China and in the US? Corporations of course get that name because they have all the Civil Rights of a human being, and at the same time they have liabilities. They can be sued as a human being can be sued. If you don't want to hold any specific human being responsible for an evil act just sue the corporation. According to Larry Elder "corporations don't pay taxes; they just pass them on to the consumer". I disagree with that but it's an interesting point of view. Gasoline prices are rising and oil corporations are getting rich off of that increase. We're hearing that summer blend gasoline is coming on line and therefore prices have to rise. Of course judging from the weather around here 25 deg. above normal, you would mistakenly think summer had arrived. Of course it's "springtime for prophets". Erwin from Sit & Sleep should be extatic. Now there is an all out media attack on Al Gore saying that the numbers are bogus in his book and movie. I'm beginning to wonder whether there will be another conspiracy to crush the electric car again. Now they have a new improved version of the electric car that uses a lithium ion betterey and has a much greater range and recharges much more quickly. Clearly such a car might be profitable and could get into wide spread use. As such - this car would be a threat to oil company corporate profits, and one wonders what measures they are going to pull out to get this car off the radar screen, as far as the public is concerned.

BLAST FROM THE PAST

AUGUST 16th. 2005 - AND EARLIER

- - - - - - -

It’s Sunday morning and I tuned in the Jesus Christ show to hear one exchange. Jesus says in addition to God’s other attributes he’s a God of infinite justice. In other words he would never ask Abraham to sacrifice his son as a burnt offering, he would never have accepted the “hanging before the Lord” of five of Michelle’s sons as an atoning sacrifice, and he would never have allowed Jeptha to sacrifice his daughter to the LORD as a fulfillment of an oath. I just want to get the record straight. One thing he said was that God can’t “Forgive” as in overlook sins as we might, for instance, if someone owed us money and we let it slide. One again he talked about an individual’s crimes against “The Man”. You can’t steal out of need, for instance. If Lazarus had stolen so much as a farthing from the Rich Man, he would have been in sin. Once again we have the subject of “eternal crime”. I’d like to go back to Rush Limbaugh and global warming. If man didn’t cause the problem, it’s also impossible for man to fix the problem. Let me ask you: does an ebola virus have a will Does an HIV virus have a will? He has no reasoning power to either commit or abatain from a certain crime. What you do is eliminate it because it’s evil. Indeed we punish the creator of computer viruses and kill the virus. We do not punish the virus. It doesn’t make any difference whether a dog attacks a man guilty of some crime, or the President of the United States. The penalty is the same; we destroy the dog and punish the owner. So how is it man can be guilty of committing an “Eternal” crime? In the first place, God hasn’t suffered any, as in the case of the ebola virus. In the second place man lacks the moral capacity to even understand eternity, so how can he commit an “Eternal” crime? If Jesus is right and that God, unlike us, being an God of unlimited Justice, is therefore unable to forgive, than I say “Be it done unto you as you have said. Were I Greek I’d be using the dreaded “middle voice”. If God is to be ruled by Infinite Justice, let him be judged by his own rules. (Selah) Mike doesn’t like the concept of the whole show.

Joseph Byden would seem to make a logical candidate for President on the Democratic side. He’s a good looking older man with a clear, appealing presentation. Unfortunately I disagree with him on specific issues. Both he and I agree that the John Roberts hearings ought to be a thorough hearing on all views. You’re appoint the man for life and “actuarial tables” say he will serve thirty years. Of course he did that “work on a case” for gay rights. I guess it doesn’t matter if you prostitute yourself to the highest bidder when you’re younger. Would Germans hire a man for a gov. post who once did a propaganda commercial for the Nazis? I fervently disagree with Byden on the Terry Shibo issue. As far as the war is concerned, it’s been said that we have “squandered” opportunities. I don’t see how; we’ve done the best we could. I’m happy to hear that our President now has put into place an Exit strategy. We are now gearing down our expectations for a new government and what rights the people will or won’t have. The Sunis are now coming back into prominence. The thinking is “both the Sunnis and the Shiites, are evil, but at least the Sunnis are evil and sane, rather than being evil and insane, like the Shiites.” It’s even been said that Sunni and Shiite are getting together to ward off insurgence. That’s a good sign. It’s also a good sign if there is spontaneous training of troops on our side going on. That will speed up the process. The Dr. Phil line cam be invoked that the insurgents are “raising the price of Poker” much as a two year old throwing a tantrum. The object is to break his will. Authorities agree now that the current insurgency is sort of a desperate “last gasp”. In late January we said that the Corner had been turned in Iraq. I’m definitely more confident now than a year ago.

KOLA had the Beatles at Shea Stadium. There were 56,000 fans there, as opposed to only 18,000 at the Hollywood Bowl. It was the biggest rock concert ever held to date. The event was held on Sunday night, August 15^th. 1965. I question that date; I thought it was a tad later. The next day or so KRLA played songs from the concert. They said about “going up to one hundred watts”. I guess that was a joke. They used the house P A system. There is generally less screaming in the Beatle recordings than that is in the Hollywood Bowl ones. People said that John was friendly and Paul was nervous. People were saying “John went crazy, playing the electric piano with his elbows”. John was doing Japanese yells. KLSX had early piano versions of two John songs.

Does God have Asburger Syndrome? One family gave birth to five autistic children and they claim it’s generic. I’ve never heard of autism being genetic before. But if Asburger Syndrone entails only relating to “certain things” that are obcessing on your mind all the time, God certainly fits this bill if you listen to the Jesus Christ show. His view of your problems is basically, “I don’t care”. There no “extenuating circum-stances” in life. It’s impossible for God to imagine how anyone could violate the Torah under any circumstances. But also it’s an axiom that Rape can be defined as “Any attempt by any force to altar your predestined path in life, ie. to violate your “Free Will”. The word “Free Will” has an Orwellian definition acc. to Jesus. We know that one thing God cannot do is altar what happens once it’s been set. Any attempt to warn any indiv-idual of some impending problem if they continue along their set course is deemed by God to be “Raping” that individual. In essence, according to Jesus, Jesus died for the Elect and only the Elect. Wake up and smell the coffee.

This is Saturday July 30, 2005 at eight o clock and we have just listened to the past four Governors of the State of California debate issues on TV. They had three commercial breaks in the first 25 minutes. That’s too many. Now Law and Order is on. Of course I believe Proposition 13 was one of the biggest mistakes we have and had I been Jerry Brown in 1978 I would have stood my ground and not have been “Born Again” on the issue. I’m sure the public wouldn’t mind the median price of a home being two hundred thousand dollars cheaper. You’ll never know will happen. Brown points out that Industry pays a much lower percentage of the property tax now than they used to. I think reapportionment done by retired Liberal judges is a ghastly idea. I’m also against having mixed party primaries. I thought that Ballot proposition was an terrible idea. I am in favor of abolishing “mandated increase” spending on programs. We need to get a grip on our funds. However I am against calling a special election this November 8^th. It’s a waste of taxpayer’s money. As you know I’m even having second thoughts as to whether the recall was even a good idea. Perhaps we should have tried a little harder to work with Gray Davis. I am basically opposed to electing the Governor and Lieutenant Governor together. This isn’t Washington; the situation is different. I am against giving Mayors power over the schools. It was set up the way it is for a reason. I can’t think of anything worse than some pro gay Mayor like in San Francisco making policy that in-fluences our kids. I associate Mayors with the idea of a “political boss” structure, too. I was for Prop 187 but the Federal Government has its own counter-productive ideas on the subject of immigration. I am and always have been against the State Lottery. The fact it we were promised it would solve our tax problems. Instead poor people are only getting poorer. I think I would ban all advertising of any gambling on TV and Radio. If you want to cut taxes, cut cigarette taxes. Like the Lottery, these are regressive taxes on the poor. Personally I think we need a real pruning job on Death Row. If they don’t start executing more convicted murderers soon I’m afraid some Court is going to step in and say that the Death penalty is inherently unfair only singling out a few.

The Jesus Christ show was on. The last thing Jesus said was an affirmation of his denial of Reincarnation as a doctrine. He says the counsel of Nicea considered it and excluded it. The only verse against Reincarnation is that vague one in Hebrews. Hebrews is the book without an author and by the Counsel’s own guidelines, should be excluded as a canonized book. A chief logical reason for denying reincarnation would be that we have no spirit or “soul” that is separate from our DNA and the chemical structure of our brains to “continue” after we die. Obviously this logic excludes other things besides reincarnation. Jesus talked about prayer and how it’s a good idea, though it sure doesn’t accomplish in me the things he says it will. Jesus was asked about a Magic act on TV and says the man is a “false prophet” and you could get into idolatry, and it’s all just entertainment mixed with trickery. Jesus was asked about tithing and says you get as a churchman all that free stuff like free counseling, and the Pastor can be woken up at any time in the night when called upon. (I highly doubt that!) and how you’re reaping the benefit of all that air conditioning and parking and utility bills. The life the show seems to “advertise” is one of conjecture and fantasy, and is not obtainable by pious acts. If I read Christian doctrine right, “Quid pro quo” is not a doctrine.

Last night it was two “Law and Order” s. You still can’t kill someone because they’re a convicted child molester. Jesus today said “If you are angry with someone you are guilty of murder”. That’s just false. Murder is the taking of a human life. You have to commit that act. But if Jesus wants to play that game- what about “lusting in your heart?” Is that adultery? Which is the greater offence? –Adultery or murder? If the crime of murder is to be rendered near meaningless by Jesus’ edict, doesn’t that make it irrelevant whether or not you have actually committed adultery? (Selah)

There are two more axioms you should take with you
from today's commentary. One of them is
GOD DOESN'T ALLOW DO-OVERS
and the other one is
PEOPLE DON'T CHANGE

"There you have it, Gentlemen.
What more evidence do we need?"

Thom Hartman today was talking about “Classic liberalism”. What passes for liberal among people like Hillary and Jesse Jackson isn’t classic liberalism at all. Both the classic conservatives and these “neo-libs” see human nature as inherently evil and needing to be corrected by government. In the case of a conservative, it’s being under the thumb of some all powerful dictator. In the case of a liberal it’s being under the sway of an all powerful government beaurocracy, which strangles all your efforts. At any case they don’t trust you as far as they can throw you. On some issues such as smoking and diet these two extremes might even come together. Cigarettes are “bad” and the reason doesn’t particular matter why. Either they are sinful or else they are unhealthful. But there is an area where the liberal is superior to the conservative. Liberals believe in spreading the light of education to the masses. They believe that the more "enlightenment" you have, the better. The Orion Federation goes so far as to say that failure to spread one's enlightenment that he has to others is a "sin against nature". I think it's in our nature to want to sway others to our point of view. To say that ignorance is good is to think in Orwellian terms. Gene Scott once said, "I know that women are smarter than men and it's up to me to insure that they never find it out". This is shovenisum carried to a quintessential level. I believe "The Prime directive" as portrayed in StarTrek is immoral. There was one little girl named Sarjenka who said at her ham microphone "Is anybody out there?" and Mr. Data said "Yes". She was asking for help for her planet. But after a while the idea was come up with to proform brain surgery on her so she didn't remember the encounter or carry away anything from it. I do find it a curious fact that most of the highly educated people in the world seem to be liberals. But some liberals, and I just talked to one last night, can be downright fasciestic in their world view and way of thinking and generalizations they make about people. Classic liberalisum does not make sweeping generalizations about people. They view each person on their merits. Neo liberalisum makes all sorts of generalizations about people and believe there is a whole "set of beliefs" and if you sray on one belief you're probably guilty on straying on others. Classic liberalisum believes in promotion by merit and not by class or some other reason. Classic liberalisum sees slavery as a conspiricy to keep certain races and sexes down by keeping them superstitious, compliant and ignorant. It would be Star Trek's belief that the reason why "warp drive" technology hasn't been shared with us is that someone wants to keep all the technology for themselves. If someone is ignorant, they are easier to control. I hope I have clarified this issue for you a little.

Chuck Hagel will probably be announcing for President today. He is the anti war Republican candidate and I wish him well. I will probably vote for him. There are two candidates declairing today. The other one is Fred Thompson the one time actor turned Senator, and he is a social conservative, which I also happen to be. I know I don't sound like it in this blog but I'm against gay marriage and want to overturn Roe vs. Wade and I'd like to see second amendment rights respected. They say between Rudy and "Newt the Brute" there are enough wives to field a whole basketball team and have a spare left over.

In order to judge something it has to be at least somewhat similar to you. We don't cast moral judgements on the ebola virus even though it could kill millions. We don't morally judge a mad, rabid dog that attacks someone; we destroy the dog and move on. The more different a life form is from you the less bound it is to your (our) karmic realities. In a sense it's impossible to sin against God as one would a man because being a God is like being in a whole other dimension. I need to explain something we said around June 1st. I believe in "Skeletons from the Closet". I said that Howard had led an attack against the Centaurians but that the Federation was now pulling him off and stopping the attack. Since it's humans more than the Federation itself that is adversely affected by Centaurian activity, then it needs to be a human being who is the one to redress the activity. So, Howard needs to become human. I can't explain it better than that; it's one of those karmic laws. Even a virus has to adopt similar DNA before it can attack another cell. An invading computer needs to know how to "speak the language" in order to do damage. Most space civilizations, (so I'm told) don't bother each other but co exist nicely. If we don't get the warp drive in the next hundred years we may be little farther along in space exploration then than we are now. Perhaps you don't believe there is "anybody out there" at least as close as portrayed in my writings of only six hundred light years or even much less. Well, I guess we'll find out but even "finding out" could take a long time.

The thing is that the liberal sees good and evil as universal factors. It’s the conservative that says “Sin is sin only if someone says it is”. They are the ones who come up with dyspensationalisum and situation ethics. To explain, this view does not see morals and morality as absolute entities unto themselves but only certain modes of conduct arbitrated by God, and that God arbitrates different morals at different times, or sometimes designates a set of morals only for one specific person (such as Jim Jones). They say that karma like gravity is not universal. I always have believed there are laws we are all ruled by and can’t escape. A fish might regard water presence as universal but even as a kid I came to the conclusion that gravity was universal anywhere in the universe. However some people believe you can “cheat” by removing a graviton particle from an atom so that you aren’t subject to gravity. Drug users try all the time to “cheat” their body chemistry into thinking things are well with them when they are not. In a startrek episode they had some sort of a gambling table they were able to rig to change the peramiters of the games played on it. This sort of cheating is what Gene Scott alludes to by the statement, “I never bet except on a sure thing”. It’s not called “betting” at that point but cheating. (Selah) I believe in the Startrek episode this contraversey over the “Jondoc table” was the source of a fist fight. As an illustration of this on a moral plane, most theologians teach original sin as universal for all mankind. However the Apostle Paul contradicts this in saying “Once I was alive apart from the law but then (I learned morals) and sin came alive in me and I died. The implication of this is that there is in the Apostle’s eyes no inherent evil or consequence in sin. This is contradicted by Hebrew scripture which speaks of Real and Known consequences to unknown past sin. Conservatives are big fans of grace or “The Free Pass”. At one time the Catholic Church even sold “indulgences” to sin. In this same vein many regard a possible military draft as something which by all rights should be universal among the able bodied and not something you can bargain your way out of. Catholics today regard it immoral to sacrifice an innocent (as some sort of karmic barter) so that another may be spared the consequences of sin. Even is said conduct is voluntary some, including me, would still regard it as immpral. A moral person should specifically want the Guilty to be punished and not just “somebody”. I guess Gingrich thinks he had a free pass when he was cheating on his wife, as so many Republicans have, during the Clinton impeachment hearings, which many viewed as a referendum on morality. The Prager doctrine says basically it’s a moral duty for a parent to be a hypocrite and to hold their children to high standards they never had to endure. This “Mrs. Hennicy” doctrine is popular among conservatives who like to throw stones from glass houses. But conservative hypocricy as we have oft stated is carried to a more perverted dimension because even if you could show that next to them you look pure as the driven snow, they would come back with “all human (alias unsaved) virtue is worthless”. In Jesus’s day they had a kosher tag they placed on animals that were truly “fit” to be sacrificed and you could buy one with money. But with conservatives they hate you not for what you do but who you are Born be it black or psychic or homosexual. As such there isn’t enough money (or patience) to buy their Approval. (Selah) Of course I have brought up this “Federation” stuff where some constellation societies are more vulnerable to the karmic gravity of Alcyonne than are other star systems. In karmic law there too is such a thing as “domain” and “jourisdiction” of karma. The Orion and the Leo constellations are subject to Alcyonne karmic laws. One looking at word from an a-karmic or relitivitistic or “law of the jungle” frame might see no blame in attacking anyone who would come against you no matter what their justification. Under their own “karmic gravity” no inherent sin is incurred. You might call karma the “brother” doctrine. Since he is your brother you owe him certain golden rule considerations you might not be so quick to grant a space alien. Some Christians such as Walter Martin say “The doctrine of the universal brotherhood of man is a hericy and only people who are Saved deserved the consideration of “Brothers” Since I’m higher in the ratings now I need to be more careful what and when I just happen to bring up these spur of the moment enlightenments.